I consider myself to be reasonably well informed on gay issues, especially as they are covered in the media. So I was very much caught off guard by two facts.
First, the May 5/6, 2007 edition of the leading and public voice of the American military establishment, Stars & Stripes, the official newspaper of the United States Armed Forces, published by the Department of Defense, rather nonchalantly reports that Petty Officer 3nd Class Jason Knight has been returned to active duty and even promoted to Petty Officer 2nd Class. Yawn, you say? In 2004 Jason Knight outed himself to the United States and was summarily discharged for being gay. The second fact that caught my attention is the complete lack of media coverage of this rather startling bit of sea-changing news.
According to Stars & Stripes: "On his wedding night in July 2004, then-Petty Officer 3rd Class Jason Knight finally accepted a truth he had fought against for years: he was gay. Almost immediately, he moved to get his marriage annulled. He apologized to the woman he'd married. And when it came time to explain his changing circumstances to the Navy, he left nothing out. Under the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, he was quickly discharged from the service. But now - whether through a clerical oversight or what some claim is an unwritten change in policy to keep more gay servicemembers in the ranks at a time of war - Jason Knight is back on active duty. Since promoted to petty officer second class, Knight is finishing a scheduled one-year tour in Kuwait with Naval Customs Battalion Bravo. And, already kicked out of the Navy once, he sees no need to hide his sexual orientation." Yes, as if it is not news at all, this military newspaper tells us that an openly gay American naval officer is on active combat duty in Kuwait.
Is this the first such case? An isolated case? One of many cases? Is the notorious "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy passing quietly and ignominiously into the night? Has a sea change begun in U.S. Military policy towards homosexuals that the White House and the Pentagon hope nobody notices--especially the Red States? Or will a "clerical error" soon be corrected and Knight will be discharged a second time?
Network: 
























Comments:
(5)Add a comment
Monday 07 May
By Kenneth
It's interesting that this story isn't getting more play. Why is the media basically silent on this?
SLDN issued this statement today:
"Petty Officer Knights story shatters the myth that openly gay troops undermine unit cohesion or morale, said Sharra E. Greer, director of law and policy for Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN). The Pentagon knows full well that lesbians and gays are good service members. If military leaders believe otherwise, then they need to explain why gay troops are being called back to active duty and sent to the frontlines. SLDN applauds the Navy for recognizing Knights talent and qualification. Now the time has come to allow every gay service member to serve openly, and to repeal Dont Ask, Dont Tell."
Reply
Tuesday 08 May
By john kennedy
i was in the air force for six years and i am gay.....it is no ones business
Reply
Tuesday 08 May
By Dan
I was in service and out of that 14 were at sea. When you live with 80 guys in a 20 by 40 room, you know them. I can never remember anyone saying anything bad about the ones that were gay. (Oh and yes we do know.) The women on the other hand were close to the point of inapropriate. The thing is it was always the youngest ones that found themselves in situations. (Young people are curious) Even if not gay or lesbian. The military is a direct reflection of society as a whole. It doesn't matter if they are gay or not. In the grand scheme of it all "Who cares?".. It is not important.. Before the policy "Don't ask Don't tell" It was no big deal "Way to go Billy".. Lets just drop the issue--it doesn't matter. Do away with all policies on sexual orientation and you will strengthen the service. After all we are volunteers--right?
Reply
Monday 28 May
By JT
It seems Mr. Knight has been re-discharged.
What's deplorable as well is that they "recovered" the $13k sign-on bonus they'd given him for his first (4 year) hitch, which he all but completed, apparently going so far as to garnish his wages at his civie job to do so. Seems they definitely knew he was gay, and even went out of their way to be punitive in "recovering" the $13k he damned well earned while stationed in Kuwait.
It's time, and then some, for our government to stop treating us like criminals and 2nd class citizens.
Mr. Knight, you've earned your pay. Go after 'em for it. This is not the integrity our men and women in service deserve.
JT
Prior Service, US Army
MI Crypto
Reply
Thursday 31 May
By Theresa Borsello
They R Also Holding His Severence Pay Now, Saying They Never Got The 13k$ During His Last Inlistment, They Wiped His Account OUT Before They Let Him Go & Now They Want This Damn 13k$ AGAIN??!! A SECOND TIME!! But Yet The Navy Wants My Sons SKILLS; Because They Know He's The Best In His Field; & This IS WHAT IT Really SHOULD BE ALL ABOUT. Not What UR Sexual Preferance Is; UR Dedication; & How Well U Do Ur Job & Work Together With Ur Fellow Troops, Not This Cosmetic Bull... It's A Wonder He Hasn't Given Up On The Navy, But Jason Loves The Navy & The Job He Does For Them. Come On Who Would Take This Crap & STILL Want To STAY IN!!!!!????
Reply