compatibility. They forgot to mention their system is not set up for gay people. Surprised? I'm not. The founder, Dr. Neil Warren Clark (seen at right) has been a clinical psychologist for 35 years. He's considered an "expert" in marriage counseling and has been hailed by Time Magazine and USA Today as a "must read" author. So why would such a successful relationship mogul not want to expand his services to the gay community? Afterall, the gay community is a huge market and big supporter of LGBT-friendly companies. I started to question the motives of the eHarmony founder and did a little research. According to his website, Dr. Neil Clark Warren earned his Ph.D. in clinical psychology from The University of Chicago, where he also served as a counselor and adjunct faculty member. He received his Masters of Divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary and completed his undergraduate degree at Pepperdine University. He is an evangelical Christian and attributes much of eHarmony's initial success to its promotion on the daily radio broadcast of Focus on the Family, a Christian non-profit organization.
If there's anything that says "NO GAYS ALLOWED" it's a company founded by a conservative Christian. These are the things they don't tell you when you sign-up for eHarmony.com's services which is why one Northern California native, Linda Carlson, is suing the company for discrimination against gays, lesbians and bisexuals. Now are you surprised?
According to The Advocate, Linda Carlson said she tried to use the Internet site in February to meet a woman but could not based on her sexual orientation. When Carlson wrote to eHarmony to complain, the company refused to change its policy, according to the lawsuit filed on her behalf in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The lawsuit claims that by only offering to find a compatible match for men seeking women or women seeking men, the company was violating state law barring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

"Such outright discrimination is hurtful and disappointing for a business open to the public in this day and age," Carlson said in a statement. The suit names Pasadena-based eHarmony, company founder Neil Clark Warren and his wife Marylyn, the company's former vice president, as defendants. It seeks class action status, a jury trial and unspecified damages. The company, which conducts extensive personality profiling before introducing couples with matching values and interests, denied the allegation.
"The research that eHarmony has developed, through years of research, to match couples has been based on traits and personality patterns of successful heterosexual marriages," a company statement said.
"Nothing precludes us from providing same-sex matching in the future, it's just not a service we offer now based upon the research we have conducted," the statement said.
I don't know about you, but this whole situation has gotten me pretty pissed off. It's bad enough the GLBT community isn't allowed to get married, but to be excluded from something as simple as a dating website based on sexual orientation is an outrage. I welcome your thoughts and comments on this matter and I also invite you to email eHarmony and express your feelings on their discriminative policies. Let the gay community be heard!
Network: 





























Comments:
(13)Add a comment
Monday 11 August
By Dr. Ted Baehr
A petition to force eHarmony to accept gay users!
Please sign on, and tell your friends!
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/e4i13a66/petition.html
Reply
Monday 04 June
By zenner
has anyone noticed how the M/F couples in the eHarmony commercials actually LOOK like each other??? i've never seen such bland, pasty-faced, goody-two-shoes in my entire life.
also, looks like chemistry.com is "filling the gay void" with some very inclusive ad copy.
Reply
Monday 04 June
By E.H.
Ugh... I've know about eHarmony discriminating against gays for a long time and every time I see one of their damn commercials on TV, I curse at that man. heh :P
Reply
Monday 04 June
By Shortnails
They also E-mail spam.
Reply
Friday 08 June
By B
They told me, when I asked a few years ago, that there wasn't enough research regarding gay/lesbian couples.
Hmmm...I'm thinking all those questions would apply regardless!
Reply
Wednesday 18 July
By Bill
Well, so they don't offer their services to you as a gay person, so what? It's not like eHarmony is the public library, it's a private business, they also don't offer their services to married people looking to sneak around behind spouses back. Filing legal action on eHarmony for not providing matching services for gays would be equivalent to suing McDonald's for not serving a type of food you don't see on the menu. If you want to find a friend who has similar interest, find a web-based service that does just that, there are more than enough to choose from.
Reply
Wednesday 13 June
By debra lynn
Please dont put every christian into the "conservative" category. I am a loving mom, a wonderful friend, a great realtor. I'm also a lesbian and a christian. So how do I categorize myself? A GOD loving person that wants not to be condemned by anyone. I cant wait until we find a gene or a DNA makeup that proves we are GOD's children too. That will shut everyone up, or in EHarmonys case open up!
Reply
Wednesday 11 July
By Sarah Marie
Yes ,i too noticed that the couples DO actually look alike? why is that?i am glad that iam not the only one who sees this.
Reply
Tuesday 07 August
By Donny
The woman from California should have realized that her state's law requires for marriage that partners be one man and one woman. Why would she have expected e-harmony to treat the definition of something it is not? If she is looking for a female marriage partner, she should look in Massachusetts, Canada or the Netherlands. This is a no-brainer that HS activists are tying to spin. It doesn't fly.
Reply
Sunday 09 September
By ECG
The people obviously start of by being against gay rights due to religious boundaries in the first place, and trying to convince them to change their ways and do the right thing obviously and unfortunately didn't work. Giving an excuse well hetero success in marriages has already been proven so we wouldn't want to be involved in making things not work for gay couples. What bull!
I say why bother push for people who do not want to help. Are they the only dating site- no way let us go to another one who embrace everyone and help make it better.
Ps. isn't match.com a great one now- pretty thorough questions, also I don't know how under raps this is but I highly recommend lesbotronic.com
Peace out there.
Reply
Monday 10 September
By daphne
Of course they look alike! One of the things I remember about my college psychology class is that as the egomaniacal species that we are, we find our facial traits appealing in others.
I am absolutely positive that one of the things eharmony does is match your facial types.
Nice article. I'm a boring, strait married chick with kids, but not everyone has to be. Keep up the blog!
Reply
Friday 28 September
By Darian Pike
I have started doing some background research into Warren and his history. Most of his biography you have included but some little known tidbits about his classmates at Pepperdine might be of interest. Ken Starr, we all remember this guy right? Richard Scaife, big time neo-con contributor. Dr. Laura, thats right Dr. Laura, no real surprise there. Ben Stein, a famously conservative actor. Arthur Laffer, author of the "LAffer Curve". Armand Hammer, russian spy and all around creepy guy. I think e-harmony is a eugenics progrom.
Reply
Friday 23 November
By James George
What would be similar is if McDonald's choose not to serve Hamburgers to Gays as they have not studied the impact of their Hamburgers being consumed by Gays.
Nice Non-sequitor argument bill. Discrimation is just that Discrimination, I would also suspect they do not offer their service to Interacial couples as I am certian they don't have enough data on that either.
The Fact is we are all humans with the same basic needs, their argument is pure bs and they know it, I hope they get slapped with a huge class action suit over this.
Jim
Reply