A couple of days ago, my co-blogger in crime Richard Rothstein posted a video from American Eagle clothiers whose latest marketing gimmick includes taking a gay stereotype to a whole new level of sissy. In the video, the gay guy is portrayed as a ridiculous femmy boy who eyes an unwitting straight guy with the carnivourous look of a female tiger in heat. It's all for laughs, of course, the straight guy wants none of it. The gay guy is so over the top ... what ... faggy?, that we're all supposed to be disgusted by him.
People are up in gay arms that American Eagle is using an offensive stereotype in their marketing, but the problem is really much bigger than American Eagle's idiotic video. The problem is that much of our society -- and that includes straights as well as many gays -- hates sissies, and that, my friends, is a huge problem. More about this in a minute.
Also two days ago, another co-blogger in crime, Sanford Marcus, pitched to me the idea of posting a video of YouTube actor Chris Crocker who uploaded an emotional plea to the world to 'LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!' Sanford saw that the video would become viral wildfire on the Web, but I basically told him I thought it would be very difficult for us to position the video without it turning into a sissy-hate-fest. Crocker's uber-gayness and drama-queen-times-a-million plea to leave Britney alone was designed to be laughed at (Crocker now says it's serious and not a joke), so I asked Sanford not to post it for the simple reason that I have no interest in QueerSighted serving as a place for people to drop into to hate on the gays.
[More on sissies, plus photos, after the jump]
Today, 'Leave Britney Alone!' is all the rage, of course. Crocker's video clocked over 2 million views on YouTube in 48 hours and has been written about in the mainstream press. And did people hate on the big sissy? Oh yeah. Consider ABC News' "reporting" about the comments viewers left on YouTube responding to gay-boy Crocker's "tear-smudged eyeliner" delivery. ABC wrote, "Comments ... ranged from 'Seek therapy NOW. This is NOT normal behavior' to 'someone please shoot this fa**ot.'"
I am more than a little disturbed that ABC News would reprint a violent hate comment like "someone please shoot this fa**ot." I wonder if they would reprint racist comments along the same lines commonly found on YouTube and other public forums. I guess it might look something like, "Someone please shoot this ni**er"? Can you see that line appearing as part of an entertainment story on ABC News (and subsequently syndicated onto AOL News)? I highly doubt it, but hey, sissies are fair game, right?
Basically, both of these incidents come down to the fact that people hate a sissy, aka anyone who acts too gay (read: too effeminate.) Not only do straight people hate gays who act too gay, but gay people seem to as well. Referring to Crocker of 'Leave Britney Alone' fame, the gay blog The Malcontent said, "Larry Craig has finally been dethroned from the top of my list of gays who embarrass us all ... I shared this with several gay friends. Three out of four responses included, 'What. A. Fag.' *nod nod*"
So this is what it's come to? Not even gay people can avoid focusing on the sissy aspects of Crocker's performance, instead of its hyper-emotional, troubled angst. A sissy has embarrassed gay people more than a right-wing homophobic closet case who has all of straight America convinced that gay men are obsessed with toilet sex. Is it just me, or is something wrong with this picture?
As much as I deeply admire Richard Rothstein's analysis of the gay world, I have to respectfully disagree with the position he took on QueerSighted that "it's our fault" that America portrays gays as jokes. I don't agree with the theory that when gay people applaud stereotypes put forth by sissies like Carson Kressley and William Sledd, we shoot ourselves in the Prada loafers because the straight world is going to think less of us or not take us seriously.
My reason for saying so is this: Kressley and Sledd ARE what gays look like. Not all gays, of course. Gays come in every size, shape and degree of gay/straight mannerisms, but yes, Virginia, sissies really do still exist. There are also plenty of guys and gals you'd never guess are gay, most gay people fall somewhere in between, but does that mean we have to hide all our super-sissies in order to get the respect we say we deserve? At what cost?
For some of us, this issue hits perhaps too close to home. Think back: Were you ever a gay-acting kid? Did you have tomboy traits as a girl, or sissy tendencies as a boy? Most of us who did reacted to sissy-teasing and abuse by working like hell to act not-gay, even though it really was part of who we were. It's quite sad that society pressures us so early in our lives to kill off the parts of us deemed unfit for our gender, turning even some of the sissiest among us into major sissyphobes.
Is this what we're fighting for? The right to act straight? To only be portrayed in the media as straight-acting doctors and lawyers, not, God forbid, the fabulously talented florists and designers and artists that many of us are? And what of the gay-acting doctors? Gee, and here I thought we were fighting for the right just to be ourselves.
I'm not saying gay life should only be portrayed in the media by the effeminate stereotypes, but as long as people (including gays) hate on sissies, our lives are only being tolerated because we've molded ourselves to look like and act like "the norm," leaving our sissy brethren behind to catch the next bus.
I wish we would embrace our sissies. Ugly Betty's Justin Suarez is my hero. He's twelve years old and subscribes to Martha Stewart Living and loves fashion and knows his Sondheim from his Jerry Herman. And neither his TV-family nor fans of the show give a damn. Justin is happy because he just gets to be Justin.
My best friend from the time I was about 18 was a huge sissy. Devin plucked his eyebrows to within an inch of their lives, had lots of femmy mannerisms and didn't care one whit who had a problem with it. It was who he was. Devin died 12 years ago at the age of 33, and I'd give just about anything to have him back, partly because his very sissy-ness enriched my life so much. I will admit there were times that being with him out in the world challenged my own insecurities. One glaring event when we were 25 years old still sticks in my mind:
I was in my office one day when Devin showed up unexpectedly. When he appeared at my desk he said, "Would you look at this overcoat I'm wearing? It's a woman's coat. I just bought it that darling thrift shop we like. The lining is hand-stitched silk! I had to have it. I think it makes me look like Betty Grable, don't you? Want to grab some lunch?"
I froze. As my eyes worked their way around the office, I saw my White House colleagues (yes, that White House) listening, alarmed as they watched Devin spin around showing me his fabulous ladies coat, holding it open so I could see the hand-stitched silk lining.
I was mortified, and proceeded to let my own sissyphobia take over. I told him he had to leave at once and was never to visit me at work again.
That night, I wrestled with what had happened and how I'd reacted, coming to a very guilt-laden realization that I had placed the opinions of people who mattered very little to me above a relationship that mattered very much.
I called Devin, apologized, and told him that I'd learned a really important lesson that day. I also said I had been an ass, that I loved him and yes, in fact, he did look very Betty Grable in the coat.
My friendship with Devin kept me honest. I was out as a young gay man, but there definitely was no hiding what we were when we were out in the world together. Because of that, Devin made me braver, and I am a better person for having known him.
Sissies and other gay freaks and misfits are the real warriors of the gay movement. They are the brave ones. They have to fight much harder than the straight-acting gay man we're so desperate to have portray us in the media. While society mocks them in stupid marketing gimmicks or turns them into good Internet fodder, sissies go out into the world everyday just being themselves. No excuses, and no apologies.
That's what I'm fighting for. And for Devin.
Network: 





























Comments:
(51)Add a comment
Tuesday 11 March
By Liam
Personally I've never been a fan over the overly femmy/uber-camp thing. Not that I mind people who do fit into that category - just not my thing.
To be honest, the point of it kinda escapes me.
See, homosexuals like people of the same gender, right?
So then, what's the point in a guy who is more girly then his female friends?
As a friend of mine once said.
"I like cars. not makeup"
Reply
Saturday 24 May
By Sissykrystal
OMG I'm in love with you honey, Thank you from the heart and I so wish your wonderfull insite could be brroadcast to the world. I've been TG and Bi my whole life and very Str. acting until my 30's. Now at 50 I'm letting my real Sissy personality surface more and more because I've been hidding it deep inside for years. Even though I've been out as a TG since a teen I'm finding out the very hard way how badly Sissies are treated today.
Reply
Sunday 12 October
By Mike
Hmm, a thought provoking post. I suppose i did used to be "sissy" to a degree when i was younger. With a bit of righeous anger and Mr Logic from Viz thrown in there too. I quickly learned that if i kept up that behaviour i was almost certain to be murdered sooner or later... which made me wonder weather i'd still be appreciating the lines of the Ford Capri, the sound of a Merlin engine and the thoughts of Giovanni Gentile if i had chosen to carry on being myself and not "hidden in a shell" which contracted to become the real me. Oh and also Britney should be swung from a tree.
PS - The "Gay History Locations" link may be broken, it just goes to a generic page. But i bet it doesn't include the Princess Of Wales (formerly RAF) hospital in Ely, Britain. Which it really should.
Reply
Sunday 15 February
By Rob Berger
I have always been attracted to more "fem" kinda guys ever since I can remember. I dated a man who had the highest pitched laughter (loud and long), was slender, smooth and beautiful, and had the most masculine mind (logical, scientific). I had great affection for him, but we couldn't stay together. I bristle when gay men announce their masculinity in personal ads and denounce anyone as fem, sissy, etc. I understand the terror that masculinized gay men feel, not wanting to be "the other." But, I can no more disown sissies than I can tear out my own heart.
Reply
Tuesday 10 November
By Raise
Ummm I always wondered all these gay men who keep saying "I am a man, born a man love cars no need to be sissy"...lol I am sorry but you sound retarded because we can as easily say if you are a bloody man dont be gay while you are at it...just cause gender attraction feels so instinctive doesnt mean you get to say I am gay but masculine..the idea should be freedom of expression and you as a gay man condemning those who are abit different is quiet insensitive and shallow and just shows that you have learned nothing of you being gay...
All I am saying is have solid convictions if you think a man should be a man from a certain text book "the bible" then stick to it..but if you are gonna pick what you feel is right have the decency to respect other peoples choices...
My opinion on sissies??..I used to be such a sissy when I was young but it was beaten the crap out of me, I dont know what to express anymore, trapped between being selfish to express who I am, and depressed of acting for the sake of the public/family. I wish I would be brave to just stick to what I am but I am still not sure if doing whatever you feel like is right.
Kisses to all the "sissy" guys, thumbs down to everyone who dislikes them. Peace.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Kevin - Long Beach, CA
I agree with you mostly. I used to say "See, I'm (relatively) masculine, and Gay!" as if being feminine and gay were a bad thing. But I've worked hard to accept that...
1. I'm not as "masculine" as I thought. lol.
2. Some wonderful people are (relatively) effeminate and gay. And great people!
I accept that it's my self-hatred. Being a "sissy" is wrong is what I have heard since... conception? And in the past I have allowed it to cloud my seeing the greatness in people. I usually agree with Richard on 99% of things. I love reading his posts. But I believe you are right in that on this one, he's slightly off base.
Only SLIGHTLY though! I do believe that American Eagle made a big mistake. They have to be aware of the climate in America, and that this kind of portrayal of gays in a commercial geared to the younger gen WOULD (As Richard put it) deliver every straight teen boy's worst nightmare of "soooooooooo gay." I mean... it's not the fact that he's so effeminate, nearly so much as he is... well, just icky! With that "I love you so much I want to eat your spleen" smile he's wearing, I'm scared just watching it.... And that's what America is going to see as a gay person in the media? American Eagle did not have their thinking caps on that day.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Kenneth Hill
@ Kevin: Ha, glad you've gained some self-realization! ;-)
I agree that Richard and I are both right, in a sense. The American Eagle thing is indeed an insulting portrayal of a very exaggerated sissy boy. But it is possible for sissies to be used in advertising in a nice way. Carson Kressley, in fact, was awesome in that commercial (Pepsi??) where a hot guy is walking down the street, women are turning to look back, then Carson does too. That was a great example of how sissies can be respected and be part of a media joke -- not THE joke.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Marshall
WOW.
First of all, thanks to your post I look like Corcker, my mascara is tear streaked and I'll never get the blotches around my eyes to go away. My boss will just have to deal with it!
That said, thank you! A Thousand times thank you! Thank you for saying so eloquently what I've been thinking in the back of my mind everytime i read a post/hear a comment about the you tube fashion guy, or the emotional plea for Brittney, or the general "sissy-phobia" that we deal with everyday in our lives! Thank you for speaking truth to this issue!
I have to say that my semesters in the American Studies program at the University of New Mexico brought a lot of these issues to my attention. Something that has always struck me, as a feminist as well as a queer kid, is this funny double standard. Madonna even mentions it in the beginning of one of her songs. It's acceptable to be butch as a woman, to dress like a man, but its not ok for a man to be femme or dress like a woman. Why is this? Because its ok to be a man, but its not ok to be a woman, period. This is all driven by sexism. Its driven by the fact that men are losing their control on society, women are gaining power, capitol, and recognition as equal. When men start to blur those lines of power, but acting/dressing/seeming effeminate it only frightens most men even more. Sexism, I feel, is the root of this phobia.
Regardless of the root, thank you for posting the truth about it all. Thank you for communicating to our peers that idea that "straight acting" isn't something to be proud of, anymore so than "fabulous drag queen!"
~~Proud occasional sissy!
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Mark
Thank you for defending sissies--you're right, their bravery every single day is astounding.
I think Marshall is right about sexism, but it's even deeper than that somehow. Straight men are so threatened by anything that challenges their own sense of masculinity. I don't understand the depth of their insecurity, but their anger, defensiveness, and violence show it clearly for what it is.
Don't forget that we grow up in their culture, drinking in their values along with our mothers' milk. That's why we have to be so careful to evaluate ourselves and our reactions: how often are we just mirroring the dominant culture? Sadly, as your column shows, too often.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Andrew
"I think if one is able to admit that he/she can be wrong then he or she ... can understand"
Wow! well the blogs are heating up these days. Kenny that was honorable & admirable! I've learned that speaking honestly becomes easier just like lying. Once you get used to telling lies, telling the truth it gets easier.
I'll admit that I laughed at CCrocker's video, I laughed hysterically because I didn't understand whether it was good acting/attention seeking or if it was actually true. Since it was true it's really not all that funny. I'll be waiting for the next young fellow to get his 15 seconds of fame.
Maybe in the end we'll all realize that it doesn't matter?
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Miss P.
Daumn Kenny ever since I read Richards post I was trying to find a way to put my feelings into words and you did it! Thanks. While I agree with Richard about the Amreican Eagle Vid. and some of the points he brought up, It desturbed me abit about some of our own internal homophobia about *sissies* and any other gay stereotype.
I also found it ironic on the same day you did your post on Frank Kameny items being placed in the Smithsonian which included signs used in his protrest at the White House. If I remember my queer history right the protesters decided that boys would wear ties and look like men and the Women would be in dresses and look like women, please correct me if i'm wrong. Richard did his post on the AE. I went away thinking after reading both posts that after all this time are we still *that* concerned with how society reacts to us and being a sissy is a bad thing. Dont get me wrong, i beleive what that what Frank Kameny and other during that time were brave and did what they had to do at that time.
BUT..One thing I've always felt lucky about being gay is we have made our own rules, culture, customs and along the way found in doing so we have forced straight society to accept how we are, not the other way around.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Bo
This post is brilliant! And spot on. You explain how vast our own homophobia is--and to the degree in which is harms our community and ourselves. Thank you for having the courage to explain your own awakening.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Joe Lagana
I often confuse 'observation' with 'judgement'..i can observe that someone is a sissy, but if i judge that behavior, then i'm in a whole new realm. I think we all have a personal responsibility to be true to ourselves, and live the most authentic life we can. Sometimes, that means "passing" - it's not the best way to be, but sometimes it's the safest. Let's face it - we're gay, and our choices are never easy. Thank you all for a wonderful debate.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Julie
Brilliant. Though I always expect that from you!
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Marty in Mpls
Good post Kenny, I agree that instead of trying to hide our sissies (and portrayals of them) we should be defending them. We all just want to be who we are, sissies included. All the really effeminate gay men Ive known have been clever, witty, and fun (like Carson). I kind of wonder it isnt a defense mechanism, or maybe it just comes naturally for them? Whatever
As far as the ad, the sissy is obviously a caricature, as is the valley girl friend of the girl he is hitting on. The straight guy doesnt get offended and agrees to see the band with him, just showing how pathetic the straight guys life is. And what about his black coworker friend who gives him a hug, he sure came off as a queen to me. I certainly dont think this piece is something to be offended by, and, unless the straight guy gets something eventually, I dont think I have any reason to be buying anything from American Eagle.
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Greg
Along with what Mark was saying, I think the straight guy's chauvinistic fear at hand is more of a "I can't associate with gay guys because they're a threat to my own masculinity, especially considering every one of them wants my ass." rather than "sooooooooo gay." I believe this concept is referred to as homophobia, and I believe it is real, and I believe it is sanctioned by the AE corporation upon the airing of said commercial.
When I was a little kid (as opposed to a big kid which I now am) I not only acted femme, I looked like a girl to boot. I would get infuriated, confused, and deeply saddened on a regular basis when dealing with other peoples' prejudices and maledictions while growing up. When I told my feminist mother how I was being teased for being girly, she would ask, "What's wrong with being a girl?" By high school I had the straight act down.
Believe me, I heart sissies as much as the next gay. In fact, when I was student teaching and my host teacher called the students "sissies" when they didn't play their instruments loud enough, I would point out aloud that I knew many sissies who could play any of the kids into the ground. I guess my point is that like in the anecdotes above, Western civilization is still not comfortable with individuals pushing the boundaries of gender, and by allowing it to continue to portray effeminate men/butch women in a comedic threatening hyperbole - like in the AE commercial - there is no progression to be made for anyone, only retrogression. It's true we must embrace both our internal and external sissies, and in the name of all sissies, we must portray them as the heroes they are.
For example, Harvey Fierstein's book "The Sissy Duckling":
http://www.amazon.com/Sissy-Duckling-Harvey-Fierstein/dp/0689835663
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By shane
To the gay community, the American Eagle commercial should bug us because it sets forward the same old portrayal of gays... as usual, straight people are telling us who we are.
But if we have any contempt for the character portrayed in that commercial, shouldn't it be because the feminine guy was so upfront about his interest in the straight boy? I don't see how we should all care one way or the other how 'gay' he acts, because big deal, he's being himself (going along with the story here). But he shows his obnoxious interest in the obviously straight boy, which puts forward the idea that gays are just crazed sex-fiends with no self-control, a stereotype the straight media LOVES to play on (ex. gay pride for the media= gays in skimpy clothing). The problem with the gay guy in the commercial isn't that he's so effeminate (though that's what most straight people will notice with disguist), it's that he's (nearly) sexually harassing the poor boy!
I was frustrated by the stereotype that gays are incapable of functionable social interaction because we're just too 'different,' as though we don't pick up on social cues because something is wrong with us. Even the most effeminate gay man would not have nearly drooled on his shirt like the boy in that commercial. It was just so ridiculous.
And I think that maybe for gays, 'Chris Crocker' should be laughable not because he's 'soooo gay,' but because he's so upset over something so lame! Yes, Britney gets bashed hard by the media and yes, they have driven her to destroy herself. But she's also completely superficial, and to get so upset over someone so materialistic is 'soooo stupid.'
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Daniel
Great post, Kenneth. I am not feminine, but I completely believe that everyone should be able to be themselves, no matter what. Everything that we know to be "sissy" or only for women is only because of long-standing ideas. There is no physical or fundamental reason why men don't wear dresses, or why women wear makeup, but men aren't "allowed." These are just concepts, formed ages ago, that have had sufficient time to coalesce into social standards.
We've been told that women are supposed to act, dress and feel a certain way, and men dare not join in (and vice versa). How come women get to reserve luxurious coats, glamorous jewelry, and affectionate linguistic modifiers, but men saying "honey" and wearing dangling earrings are despised?
The bottom line: you can't please everyone. No matter who you are, there will be people who dislike you. You can't possibly please everyone; be yourself. After all, like Ellen DeGeneres said, "What other people think of me is none of my business"
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Queer john
Bravo!
Reply
Thursday 13 September
By Craig Browning
I can understand "the point" behind what's being said and do in part agree. On the other hand I believe that the gay community is over zealous in stressing certain things (peculiarities) to the point of over-emphasizing them in order to make them an issue. Personally, I can't stand the overtly sissified; I'm a man, I was born a man and I'll die a man. Yes, I can camp it up with the best of them and I enjoy good camp but decorum is the key to genuine success; everything has its place and time and there is no reason to promote the idea of the negative stereotype if what we want is "equality" vs. the "special rights" our opponents keep saying we're really after.
Reply